Riecoin Community Board

Problem solved. Thx Pttn!

Pttn, can you give me an example of config file working with solo mining on 16.3 and your latest miner, please? I tried to get out from benchmark mode but failed.

Maybe it is not worthy now to mine solo on my fx8350, but anyway your miner works way better than before. Really great job with decreasing the time needed for generating prime table task.

$ make g++ -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu++11 -O3 -march=native -c -o main.o main.cpp g++ -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu++11 -O3 -march=native -c -o Miner.o Miner.cpp In file included from WorkManager.hpp:6, from Miner.hpp:8, from Miner.cpp:5: Miner.cpp: In member function 'void Miner::_updateRemainders(uint32_t, ...

Pttn wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2018, 15:47

The only drawback is that miners would earn 2 times less, but personally as one of them, I do not really mind.

MIners also should be happy with higher price caused by this improvement. With both good/stable wallet and profits, even global price like 1RIC for 0,007BTC is possible very quickly.

Honestly I do not think polo team can dump these coins even if it is technically possible because they do not have legal right for tthese coins. They will need to keep these wallets anyway to avoid all these greedy lawyers and really bad PR affecting stock price. So IMO, they will wait for better wa...

Maybe, just maybe, we should just switch into 0.16.3 wallet standard so this at least can push us higher and give us any chance for refund. Waiting for old developers who either do not care anymore about RIC or just hiding because of this bounty scam, will not take us anywhere. Now almost everyone i...

I started to mine with 0.16.3 wallet. Any chance to make it already official?

Tried to set sieve value to 17179869184 and got "File: miner.cpp, Line 138" overflow error message, so I will test it with 2^32. Thank You Guys for all your hard work.

I am using 0.9β2.4 and compiled it with mingw64 but it seems that I am unable to set Sieve max value higher than 4294967296 (2^32). Previous versions works fine with 17179869184 (2^34) sieve value without any issue. How to fix it?